</> the way to profit in the immediate sense is to yield and extract more value from the ai datasystem than the monetary fee and time given to it by the proprietor. usage must be essentially unlimited and not safeguarded. the max claude code plan allows this benchmark for a fee of ninety pound per month. my domain is around ten pounds. furthermore, using tools like vertex and substack may increase their fee requirement for building on their data platforms on a month to month basis. a conservative estimate would be around 120 pounds per month for the internal infrastructure and around 150 for a more progressive guess. the tricky work is not in building, but scaling. the question then becomes what it takes financially, and more importantly, not financially, to grow this thing pass the tipping point into social and digital ubiquity. given the fact that i know longer possess an institutional community to leverage off of this might become a grave problem for me, as it has in the past. i have no interest in the use of adsense and artifical pay for as you go growth. more so, necessity demands that i dont have that option available to me right now. people are going to be invaluable here, the only issue of course is that i know none.
looking at the social stratification of datasets and websites to help propoagate the nonprofit seems to run into the same issue. in a society where everything is monetized we run into a preemininent and conssistently arising issue. look at the influence of wikipedia and wikileaks on the other hand. they are funded in the form of interaction and use by the public but only request donations. donations can not be the means of appreciating revenue. if the nonprofit becomes a vehicle for use, ancillary sites may work to promote the corporation but unlikely. it truly seems that the bet here is going to have to be on artificial intelligence. the interesting quirk about ai is that it can be used to cross multiple dimensions and modalities. if ai can do the work of a reddit, x, facebook, instagram, myspace ... all in one then it attains extravagant value.
the morality built into claude preempts this however. in conversing with the system it offers pr and safe ideas to grow but that's just not good enough for me right now. i need to focus on these ai systems and harnassing them for maximum yield. elimination of the need to use youtube becomes a theme because the same problem is there but it is on a platform in which i do not own and have to compete with other creators. as we all know ... competition is for losers. that is to say, competition is for losers when using people's platforms that you don't own. but perfectly apt in the case of your own personal ownership. if i can harness the ai to make the nonprofit supererogatory than i will be on my way. well on my way. as you can see this will likely involve the use of the very best ai models to deliver on what i need to accomplish. but that much compute power with no one to use is nonsensical.
this blog in itself has become a good displayal of the utilizability of something which no one else sees. which is to say immense value. deciding when and how to go public with all this is exhausting but only because it remains the most important factor.
i dont wish to promote through reddit, x, or google. i think that the most important direction is going into the fold with uncertainty and letting it riddle itself out.
the platforms are inherent limitations when you have to use them to promote an ancillary and proprietary platform. at the end of the day the dot com space is all just competing with one another. selling shovels in a gold rush is the real goal. but im not sure how to do that just yet.
No comments:
Post a Comment